"...real disappointments” with the way Sellafield has been run by the consortium..."
"...he expected “to be further along than we are” but insisted the past four and a half years were not a total waste of taxpayers’ money..."
"...the NDA was criticised by MPs for continuing to shower millions in fees on the American-led consortium that manages Sellafield Limited..."
""...“We have been disappointed by some lack of progress and some things that have gone wrong.”...""
"...Its biggest challenge is dealing with the UK’s legacy of nuclear waste, which experts say will cost an estimated £67.5 billion to deal with..."
"...The consortium – .... – last year earned £54m in performance-related fees, but some of their profits will go to settle a £700,000 fine..."
"...Sellafield Ltd admitted breaching health and safety law.... Sellafield Ltd must also pay £72,635 in costs..."
------------------------------------------------------//---------------------------------------------
Under "Have your say" I did offer the following comment, but I think the News& Star will probably not print it They did print it:
Just do
one thing right, Mr Clarke - make the no-brainer decision to accept GE
Hitachi's ZERO-COST offer to use one of their PRISM reactors to burn our
plutonium stockpile.
It's
costing us poor tax-payers £80 million a year to store and protect this stuff.
GE Hitachi offer payments by results - if they don't succeed in burning the
plutonium, we don't pay anything! Stop messing about and get the decision made!
There's
a gold star in it for you, from Mr Davey. Once into the process, this reactor
renders the plutonium useless as a bomb making material and continues to
generate enough electricity, from the fuel created, for 750,000 people for 50
or 60 years - emission-free!
On it's
own it's a decent contribution to Mr Davey's carbon targets. A fleet of them,
configured as breeder reactors could burn our legacy waste as fuel - as your
legacy waste problems reduce, we get clean, cheap electricity.
